Guns & Roses without the Rose?

Via Starpulse, I’ve noticed that Guns & Roses are going to reunite, almost.
According to the source, they are all going to be at LA’s Key Club on the 28th for the 20th anniversary of Appetite for Destruction, except for Axl Rose. What kind of nonsense is this? Is Axl Rose dumb enough to not like the cash cow that once was Guns & Roses?
No offense to Scott Weiland, of course. He’s a rockin’ performer as well as a great artist. I’m just dying to hear “Patience” live.
Oh, and a little bit of advice for Mr. Rose: The dreads have jumped the shark…live ten years ago.
Tags: Guns & RosesLast 5 posts in Guns & Roses
- Slash handled Axl Rose with kid gloves - November 1st, 2007
- Slash says Chinese Democracy will be released when Axl is ready - October 25th, 2007
- I think I'm going to have a heart attack! - June 3rd, 2007
- Music Review: Guns & Roses: Appetite For Destruction - May 29th, 2007
| 2.5 |
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Guns & Roses

Roberta on July 23rd, 2007 
2 opinions for Guns & Roses without the Rose?
Jul 24, 2007 at 12:33 pm
No Axl? HA. You’re right…they’re almost getting together…it’s like being a “little bit pregnant.”
Of course shit happens, and if he can’t show, he can’t show; but it’s the 20th Anniversary…sigh…
Jul 24, 2007 at 4:07 pm
I know, right! He should be there, it’s the anniversary for Appetite for Destruction, which is one of the best albums of the 80s.
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: