Miley Cyrus did not save Fuzzy the cat

posted by roberta — Nov 24th, 2009

91017M5_CYRUS_B-GR_01And zap! — your fifteen minutes of fame are over you crazy cat person. Miley Cyrus’ crazed lunatic fan who claimed he/she was taking the life of a healthy pet and sacrificing it over Miley’s quitting Twitter, has gone through with her promise.

Or so she says. The fan, who remains nameless at this point, said that he/she took Fuzzy to the vet yesterday and had him euthanized. Afterward, she took Fuzzy home and enjoyed a Mountain Dew while eating his remains.

While assuming that this is true is just plain gross, I’m going to have to call BS on this whole thing. I would assume that in euthanizing Fuzzy, the veterinarian used some sort of barbituate, such as pentobarbital. When consuming the pet the same day, would this unstable fan have suffered any of the side effects of the drug?

Also, the crazed fan posted photos of “dead Fuzzy”, but it actually looks like the kitty is sound asleep. I call hoax.

Now what are you going to do to try and get Miley back to Twitter?

On a side note, I have emailed and Tweeted this person for a response to the above questions. Stay tuned.

Update: You know, this whole thing had me thinking back to when I had to babysit my old boss’ cat, Mom, where I used to work. Mom was old and one day, I came into the office to find Mom had passed away. She got pretty stiff, after only a pretty short while. She was in the same position as this cat is, but that’s because she was jumping for a chair and got her claws sunk into the chair when she met her maker.

The point is, how could the vet stretch this cat out like this, assuming that Fuzzy was laying comfortably until he passed away? This whole story reeks of dishonesty and using Miley’s name for a shot at fame. The anonymity, of course, is because he’s killing a cat.

Image Credit: Bauer-Griffin

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

12 Comments

  1. I don’t know what kind of person would take the time to stretch out a dead cat before photographing it. I’ve had several cats over the years, and that cat is definitely just asleep.

    It’s a total hoax.

    Comment by President Filmore — November 24, 2009 @ 1:32 am

  2. i dont think the person did it, i looked at the pictures that the person took and it looks like the cat is streching and i can clearly see that the face has bin photoshoped to look like it has died there is no way that person killed the cat

    Comment by john — November 24, 2009 @ 10:41 am

  3. i dunno it’s wierd about dead cats you can look at them and pictures of them and you can tell that somehow there’s a kind of “empty” look about them. It’s not something obvious in the picture but there’s a sort of look in the body and the face that the cat is dead. either way the person is beyond sick. I hope she gets found out there are gonna be cat lovers all over the world baying for her blood. if she really did kill fuzzy hope the guilt of killing the cat that she herself describes as one of her best friends is more than she can bear. She deserves to live with that for the rest of her life.

    tl;dr: i think she really did kill fuzzy and i hope she suffers.

    Comment by Richard — November 24, 2009 @ 7:50 pm

  4. I hate this society, explain why every time more racy Miley pics come out people say that they know for a fact that they weren’t photoshopped, when they are always wrong? I am not ready to call bluff just yet, regardless of us wanting to believe nobody will kill their cat.

    Comment by Qwerty — November 25, 2009 @ 8:10 am

  5. I actually have spoken to a personal friend who is a psychiatrist about this story, and they said that this person is clearly a psychopath, and more than likely did kill the cat.

    Comment by Qwerty — November 25, 2009 @ 4:04 pm

  6. HAHA.

    Comment by ANDREA — December 1, 2009 @ 4:24 pm

  7. and now, she’s having a dog :( who know who will be threaten next time. poor dog, I must say. this kind of person should be banned from having anything as a pet, even a worm or an ant.

    Comment by dee — December 7, 2009 @ 2:48 am

  8. banned? she should be lined up and shot!

    Comment by Richard — December 7, 2009 @ 1:07 pm

  9. Also, if you look at the belly, there’s a reddish/pinkish tint. If the cat was dead, all blood flow would stop and it’s been established that the picture was taken a good time after the cat was “put to sleep”. The blood should’ve stopped flowing at that point. Also, her description of the euthanasia is odd. I had to put my cat to sleep when its fight with feline leukemia had finally taken it to an incurable point and it was not slow. As soon as he got the injection, he was dead, within seconds.

    Comment by Dena — December 18, 2009 @ 3:04 pm

  10. I’m sorry you can’t analyze a person over their words on a computer screen. Any therapist/psychiatrist should know that. So to base an analysis on this person via her twitter account, site, etc is just silly. I could go around making a site saying I’m married to Tom Cruise. Doesn’t mean I really believe it. It could just be done for attention or just because I want to see how people would react. Not necessarily psychotic. Though, I don’t agree with what she did, I think she did it for attention.

    Comment by Dena — December 18, 2009 @ 3:07 pm

  11. Killing a cat is does not make you a psycho. In a lot of countries eating cats is totally normal. You just don’t understad. I’m a vegetarian but people kill and eat their cows all the time but I don’t see any news stories about.

    Comment by nnuvfnv — December 18, 2009 @ 6:56 pm

  12. This is obviously a hoax. Who would kill an innocent cat just because Stupid Miley won't come back to twitter?

    Comment by idk — July 25, 2010 @ 9:40 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.