Perez Hilton posts uncensored Miley Cyrus upskirt photo

Perez Hilton is such an idiot. He got ahold of a picture of Miley Cyrus’ hoohah and posted it on his official Twitter account UNCENSORED. Apparently this fool doesn’t realize that Miley is still only seventeen-years-old, mostly wholesome- not someone requiring drug addiction help …either that, or he just doesn’t care.

It’s definitely child pornography, considering the fact that he decided that the photo should be made available for mass consumption. So sickening. I hope he gets sued or arrested for this mess.

He tweeted, “If you are easily offended, do NOT click here [REDACTED FOR OBVIOUS REASONS] Oh, Miley! Warning: truly not for the easily offended!”

Idiot.

Since, the photo has been removed, but his followers have called him out for the BS:

@PerezHilton posted a picture of Miley Cyrus’s VAGINA?! GOD I hope he gets arrested for posting child pornography. PLEASE.

@perezhilton tht is basically distr kiddie porn!!! She’s UNDERAGE!! Hope the wrong person didn’t see it… Pray, baby pray.

@PerezHilton Miley woohoo on Twitter? CHILD PORN? Not 18 yet!

@PerezHilton You are the lowest of the low posting child pornography. Knew you were scum but this is a whole other level, you know no limit

Chris Hansen wants Perez to “have a seat right there.” Gross, Mario, so gross.

UPDATE BY STEPHENV: Salon.com has an informative article explaining what kind of criminal liability Perez might have foisted upon himself. We here at EarSucker just want to make it explicitly clear that we have in no way hosted, linked or otherwise facilitated the distribution of illegal (even photoshopped) material. That is all.

UPDATE BY CHRIS HANSEN: Some of you commenters… just have a seat right over there.

Update by Roberta: Newsy has this news bit of the controversy compiled from media outlets. Check out the video after the jump!

Earsucker.com is mentioned at the :20 mark.

Share:Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

  • chelsie

    Oh Perez.

  • fsdfsfsd

    so fukking what? she has a porn video for christ's sakes! this pic is nothing

    • oh really

      idiot

  • noko

    so where’s the original pic?

    • kenny

      i dont know but i want it and befor someone says you perver ill tell u if shes wearin panties hehe

  • drew

    fsdfsfsd what the fuck are you talking about. miley cyrus does not have a porn video. you're a fucking idiot.

  • magicbunny

    he needs to be arrested AND lose his Twitter account….

  • Nadine Roger

    Hello..why is she not wearing any underwear in the first place??17 girl not wearing any underwear..what was SHE thinking ..and maybe she should close her legs…if she did not want any6one to see her “privates” then wear underwear.

    • chris

      It's slutty for her to get out of a car with open legs while wearing a skirt whether or not she's wearing underwear. This chick has no class at all – I guess Disney kept her on a leash and now she's bouncing out of control. Bet there will be a Playboy/Penthouse shoot soon after she's legal – it will sell a lot of issues, and get her the attention she seems to crave.

      • Wanizame

        Doesn't it feel awesome to judge other people?? Screw trying to understand why they do what they do–if you do that, you don't get the guilt-free sensation of condemning someone else in righteousness. You rock!! x_x

        • Kourtney

          Oh, I'm sorry it's kind of hard to understand why someone would not wear underwear while wearing a short dress. We're not judging her, we're just wondering why a 17-year-old girl doesn't have the deciency to wear the appropriate undergarments…or even why she doesn't have parents telling her that she's still a child and needs to act like one.

          I just think it's funny that we can all bash Perez Hilton for distributing "child pornography" but it's not okay to question why the "child" put herself in that position in the first place. I don't like Perez and don't condone what he did, but the fact of the matter is, if Miss Cyrus had put on some underwear, this wouldn't have happened. I can't imagine what she's going to start doing once she's 18.

    • commen sense

      haha wow. try and justify the criminal action of posting sick pics. your just as guilty in my eyes

    • Dakota

      She actually was wearing underwear, apparently you could still her 'privates' from the side. Still that is no excuse for a grown man to post a picture of a 17 year old ladies parts :|

      • K. Nights

        If, say, say a woman posted this picture, wouldn't she be just as guilty to the accusations everyone is claiming on him? However, since it is a man, people are freaking out when It's the same either way. Blowing it out of proportion does nothing to help anyone. I think many people fail to realize that the press make lots of money off things like this, it's their JOB, and if the person in question doesn't like it, they should realize that being who they are they will have all eyes on them so they have to be extra careful.

    • jenna

      she was… this was during a music video shoot.. they wouldnt let her not have underwear on.. he probably did something to the picture to get attention

  • So insensitive

    Uhhm Nadine Roger what does that matter. How do you over look this guy plastering her stuff all over the internet acceptable. I don't care if she was walking around her backyard NAKED! He had no business posting something so crude. And the fact that all you seem to question is why didn't she have any on is questionable to me. Who cares people are so insensitive including you.

    • Chris

      Not to disagree about child pornography but there is a huge difference between what is seen in a public place or even viewable from a public place versus her back yard. In general this incident is very unfortunate if it was even her and not photo shopped. To post or otherwise publish the photo is an abusive thing to do to anyone.

  • Dave

    “Nadine Roger” is obviously black, and fat. Please AN HERO. Thanks.

  • Dave

    Also, the picture is a huge letdown that shows nothing. I’d be the first person in line for Miley vag pics, however, this garbage is merely an optical illusion.

  • anonafag

    4chan.org

    • DUHHHHHHHH

      You know if you have a copy of that, YOU can be arrested for possession of child pornography, too? And the person that sends it to you? You're a dumbass.

  • Lalala

    Miley's vagina is flawless.

  • LB1
    • steve

      good job

  • MKA

    She was actually on a beach photoshoot, changing into different swimsuits.

  • blah

    miley was wearing underwear, people. there are other pictures that prove it.

    this was totally photoshopped. and, perez may have thought this was real. but in a sense, why would he post something like this? I mean, srsly he would do anything for more hits.

  • ally

    the pic is fake! her legs are slimer than that . < she IS wearing underwear Prooooof!!!

    • Ryan

      Doesn't matter. Simulated child porn is just as illegal.

  • Trolololol

    Who cares, she's fucking gorgeous

  • Jim

    Ok, so it's child porn right now? But it will be perfectly legal for her to get her ass banged on video (if she so wished) in less than 6 months from now.
    Stop being hypocrites, I know I'd do the same in Perez's position – she's a highly attractive woman and you all know you've googled the pics so quit yo jibba jabba!

    • gees dude

      Uh no.. She's a little girl. You're friggin' sick

      • steven

        i little girl…??? ha ha ha! so when she does this again in 4 months and she's 18 i don't expect you to call her a little girl, cuz i dont get how u go from a little girl to adult….u r a retard… she was a little girl at 8, now she is a 17 year old slut… deal with it.

        • david

          i bet you wouldn't like it if someone posted pics of your vagina steven

          • April

            WIN.

          • Guest

            Umm. Technically, it would be impossible to see her vagina. You are referring to her labia or pudenda. Just keeping it legit.

      • Eloise

        She's not a 'little girl' at all! If thats what people and society thought of 17 year olds then it would not be legal for her to have sex! Yes, technically it is child porn. But this is hardly a huge indiscretion on Perez's behalf, she is fully developed and does not have the BODY of a child. It is only child porn by technicality, and i am pretty sure that pedophiles would not be interested in Miley. She hardly looks like a child.

        • Ryan

          A technical felony is still a felony. DAs and US Attorneys don't usually have much sympathy for arguments that begin with "Technically it's kiddie porn, but . . . "

          • ralphie

            I would love to get ahold of the uncensored version of this pic to see what i'm missing. Being Canadian, its not legally child porn up here.

          • John

            Uh, Ralphie, do you really want to be saying that on a public forum, Canadian or not? Hope you're not planning on traveling out of Canada any time soon.

          • Stewman

            UH YEAH it is! YOU can bang a16 year old in Canada if she is willing, but don't snap any pics of yourself doing her or your going to be in posession of child porn. That's kind of fucked up eh? But it is the law.

          • Ryan

            That's law in a lot of the United States too. The age of consent is 16 in most states east of the Mississippi.

        • Julie

          You'd think they wouldn't…but I've seen plenty of creepy old men in the library watching the "Party in the USA" video

        • rich

          How about "sure you're locked in a small room for 10 years but technically it's NOT JAIL!"

        • Commen Sense

          What are you talking about? The term pedophile means anyone that is interested in someone under the age of 18. Therefore anyone finding her sexually attractive or looking at her like that is in fact also pedophile.

          • Guest

            uh… dumbass: Pedophilia (or paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in adults or late adolescents (persons age 16 and older) for whom prepubescent children are the primary or exclusive sexual object of their sex drive. keyword being prepubescent.

          • Jeff

            WRONG, paedophilia is specific to "pre-pubescent" children!
            Ephebophilia on the other hand refers to adolescents and is actually quite common among most of the population….but the media don't want you to know that, they want you in a state of fear that everyone is a pedo and out to bang your children – FFS people, get a grip

      • Modo

        You are NAIVE if you believe Miley is a little girl. She didn't have on panties…she has seen more action than a Maytag on HEAVY DUTY cycle!!!

        • GUESTANON

          HELLO! LIKE WHERE DID SHE LEAVE HER PANTIES??? DID SHE THINK NOBODY WOULD SNAP A PIC OF HER CROTCH? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M11SvDtPBhA
          A PARTY IN THE USA!

        • Common Sense

          little girl and underage are different things you idiot. why are you trying to justify the fact that this was against a law. end of story.

      • banchou-92

        Oh she is a kid now? WTF she goes to the Awards with a great cleavage, she even posts photos of herself nude, on a concert she even pole danced damn what a kid that she is she is becoming a slut and you know it so what perez did isn't wrong at all (sorry if theres any mistake i'm portuguese)

        • SweetDevil

          You're really right!

          Portuguese: Miley Cryus é somente o slut mais jovem do mundo! Torna-se mais similar Lindsey Lohan! E seu pai não cuidará dela! Perez Hilton tem um direito colocar este pic de ela para mostrar o mundo o que um slut que ela é!

    • Josie

      Chances are highly likely she is no longer a virgin. I'd say 99%. Do you think she's having sex with someone 17 or under? Highly unlikely. I do not believe it is ok to publish ANY of these pics of these skanks who choose to open their legs and let the world see what they have to offer. This is just a preview.

      And so it begins. Welcome to the Paris, Lindsey, Brittney skank club miss Cyrus. We hoped you'd do better, but we were mistaken.

      • Donovan

        there is NO chance shes a virgin. NONE.

        • common sense

          who cares? ha your sick for thinking about it.

      • bruce

        Agreed. You don't go out in public without panties on unless you just don't care who sees what. She'splaying the game; she knows what she's doing.

      • common sense

        news flash! girls everywhere dress like this, no one would know tho because they don't have photos being taken. she is considered spreading her legs for stepping out of a car? again im sure many women exit a car in this style, shes got cameras shooting literally every half second of her life.

        • real Common sense

          If you have cameras snapping at you all the time shouldn't you always wear panties to be safe. It's a little inconvenient but it's a small price to pay for a lavish lifestyle.

    • noel

      my question is did miley know about this? was she aware he took that photo? if not he could be facing charges of invasion of privacy as well as miley and her family sueing him. you say you would do the same in his place? then you would be facing the exact same charges she is not 18 yet and the justice system doesnt play when it comes to "kids".

      • Curious

        My question is: doesn't anybody in Hollywood wear underpants anymore?

        • chris

          Exactly – I guess the "legal" underwear" photos didn't do it for her, so she climbs out of a car while spreading her legs (real ladies wouldn't get out of a car in such a manner). Isn't this what Brittany or Paris did a while back? Same shot, different ho. In a few months, Cyrus will be legal for all the trash (underwear shots, lap dancing, and crotch shots) and hit the ground running. This one seems to be starting early in life.

        • Pat

          Same question. What is appealing or hygenic about not wearing underwear? I sure wouldn't want to sit in her chair after her. Ugh!

      • Fay

        Miley is a celebrity in a public place. He is not subject to an invasion of privacy claim. I love people that give out legal advice when they have no room to.

        • Douglas

          Hey retard it is called child pornography whether it is in public or not, she is underage.

          • Listo

            Depends on the state that she was. All the states have different laws in regards of the Childs Age. It depends where the picture was taken. If it was in california hilton should be okd. California got the worst laws for minors been exposed.

          • SLH

            Wrong. It has been trafficked in multiple states, therefore federal law applies. It's child porn. He's in trouble.

        • common sense

          invasion of privacy should be the least of his worries.

    • DUDE…WTF

      I agree, in 6 months time everyone will be shouting "I wanna see Miley's tits/crotch/getting her ass banged, but becuase shes 6 months underage people are like "dude thats sick" i'm actually surprised that people would say that, everyone has dreamed of seeing Miley naked so i think it's just some angry moms saying stuff like that. P.S im actually her age so don't call me a paedo

      • commen sense

        Everyone actually hasn't, because a lot of (most i hope) people respect laws and would not want the same to be done to their daughters. Again.. why do you pull the 6 month card? If that was excepted as legal you would just jump back 6 more months. Keep going until your talking about a 12 year old.. Stupid people

        • Actual Common Sense

          @Common Sense, you seem pretty adamant about respecting the law, and about how sick all the people who actually wanted to see those pictures are. If that's the case, then what are you doing on a site called "Perez Hilton posts uncensored Miley Cyrus Upskirt Photos." Seriously, what are you doing on this site? Either you wanted to see those photos, or you just go from site to site in order to let the world know about what you subjectively approve and do not approve.

          So either you're a hypocrite, or just obnoxious. Either way your opinion is worthless.

          The law is the law, and the government is stern on matters of underage pornography. But that doesn't mean that somebody who posted a picture that may or may not have shown a 17.5 year-old's vagina is any more morally reprehensible than somebody who posts a picture that shows an 18 year-old's vagina. I'm not arguing that it shouldn't be illegal, what i'm saying is that even though its illegal, calling it "disgusting" is unreasonable. A 17.5 year-old and an 18 year-old are, on average, virtually identical mentally and physically.

    • tracey

      honestly, youre a narrow minded man. Shes 17! regaurdless of her age, if she wants to make a porno its HER choice! She did call up perez hilton and his little minions to pose for a porno picture, youre a sick sick man who needs to grow up. Imagine of this was your sister, or neice or daughter. that sure would change the story wouldnt it? You need a reality check

    • evoc

      Besides, she is not statutory, at this point. And, if she went out like that, it was to be expected. Probably a well used hoo-hah, anyway.

      • commen sense

        man your sick

    • blabla

      paris is that you?

    • Commen Sense

      Jim.. your sick. Think about it, a line has to be drawn somewhere. If there was a rule saying all 17 year old girls within 6 months of being 18 were exempt from the laws then you would still be chirping your dirty thoughts if she was a few months before that cutoff. Where do you simply say its not okay? You couldn't be more wrong.

      • Jim

        I think the comment votes speak for themselves :)

        Agreed, there needs to be a cut off and at present that number has been (arbitrarily ) set at 18 – however, using a little common sense on a case-by-case basis is the way forward IMO….Miley is clearly a sexual creature (by design or natural is another question), so things like this were inevitable.
        Personally, I think anyone (male or female) who is sufficiently physically developed & sexually aware, but more importantly self-aware, should be able to do whatever they like (within context).

    • reyna

      you are so right this girl is first off wearing no panties i will whoope her lil butt 2nd she is suppost to be a role model and yet everyone is thinking of paris hilton as the petifile hellooooooooooooo!!!!!!!! he just put her out thee as the lil entertainment sluts and fast ass kids thats out!

    • jjj

      children are charge with adult crime at 17 so why this is child porn legally at 17 she is an adult i agree with the people being hypocrites

      • jjjj

        she should not be showing her wares in public period she wants out of her contract desperate with disney so she is acting like britney spears doesnt it makes u wonder why these disney starlets do these antics after impress young children

    • hypocrites

      Brilliant! F**k off to all the hypocrites. And who says a picture of a teen pussy necessarily consitute pornography! If it is then why is she not liable for distribution of porn. Goddamnit, she's wearing the socalled porn.

    • MaKayla

      OMG Y would u wanna take pics like dat of her anyway??

    • mike

      she's almost an adult she knows what she is doing…..besides….the guy who took her pic gets fucked up the ass by other idiots of his kind….hollywood is just an imagery of fucked up people …& peolpe all want to live that….wow!!! sick fucking world we live in

  • Henry

    For everyone out there calling Perez a pedo, this is incorrect… try Googling "Ephebophilia" and get your facts right :)

  • steve

    People! Just stop! Stop praying to God that no one sees this picture! IT'S FAKE! Ha ha ha ha! It was Photoshopped. Hilton IS NOT going to jail. What IS NOT FAKE is Miley's Porn Video…pray to God so that she stops being such a whore!

    • Ryan

      Actually, it's child porn either way according to federal law and the law of many states.

    • noel

      actually by the law even if you were to take a 8 yr olds pic and photoshop it to a obviusly adult woman it is still child porn. fake or not it is still considered child porn. and if it is real what does it matter that she isnt wearing underwear someone took a photo of her privats put it on the internet and that is a form of slander. she is still a victime even if the pic is fake.

    • Tori

      Amen.

  • skankyd

    I can die happy now

  • Brad

    Apparently, the photo could be fake: http://www.newsbythepeople.com/2010/06/15/perez-h

  • legend

    Someone needs to ask Miley, the authority in this matter, what is the truth. This is a talented, beautiful, witty, adorable young LADY, and her input would seem to be the most important. Let's please give Miley a say in this matter. It is hers to address or not. Back in the 70's there were some Gross (that's the name of the Photographer) photos of Brooke Shields that were full-on nude. They sell for 15-30'000 dollars nowadays, and are considered artwork. Further, Eva Ionesco was photographed by her mom, Irina, throughout her life, and even Time magazine named Irina Ionesco their Photographer of the year in 1976. If you have ever seen what remains of those photos of her daughter (and they STILL SELL THOSE PHOTOBOOKS on EBAY, I add) you would wonder how any prosecutor could press a case with a straight face over this Miley pic. It's a candid, not posed, picture, and can thus be viewed through the long view of any news story angle, and thus eclipse the more stilted and lurid "other" descriptions. I don't know what the feds are thinking making the low hanging fruit of this type of crime a priority, but I do know it was a Federal Agent who placed about 60 megabytes of this content on the file trading networks. Then the feds played round-up. Just like the same exploits of Hoover against the homosexual men back in the 60's, offering them gay porn magazines, and then arresting all who purchased. Such a waste of law enforcement assets.

  • legend

    brothers

  • Guest

    Does this look like a child to you?

    • Rossy

      Just so everyone knows, people who try to use this argument = pedophiles.

  • EFFYOU

    AGREED. SHE IS A LITTLE HOE SO I'M SURE THIS WON'T BE THE LAST TIME WE SEE HER COOCH.

  • Victoria

    Regardless of her behavior or what she chooses to show or not show, the picture and posting it are in poor taste.. Some say it is fake, but come on, close your legs.. She is not a little girl but she is a young woman and is still under 18.. screw technically.. because technically is what is proof.. Hello… She is under 18, its illegal.. if she's flashing poon at 17 she'll still be doing it in a few months when she's 18, look all you want then..cuz then its not illegal.. regardless of how you feel about it, its still illegal… but something I haven't seen discussed anywhere else.. what about the photographer? Even taking the picture is illegal

  • Dave

    Perfectly legal in the UK. Looking for the uncensored version now. Yum!

    • MLD

      Funny considering the reports I read said he was potentially in trouble in the UK.

  • USA

    i want the whole celebrity obsession to crumble. what are the contributions from this? nothing. waste of life, time, energy and talent where there might be some. sick. i am posting this so you will get a grip, and recognize that that fake or not, she is a GIRL, sadly sexualized for your amusement.

    • 456

      hahah is great!

  • Flacura

    I’m not in favor of perez hilton, but C’moooooooon!!! She’s the one whos getting out of her house like that… why doesn’t SHE thinks of it… it wasn’t perez hilton the one who decided to wear that, and to flash everyone around it (including the man with the camera)… a little bit of preparation before getting out of the house girl!!!!

  • dude

    You idiots~!@!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    ITS TOTALLY BEEN PHOTOSHOPPED
    LOOK AT HER RIGHT LEG, AND HER HIPS
    LEGS COME OUT OF DIFFERENT SIDES!!!!!!!

    I'M NOT SURE IF YOU NOTICED, BUT THAT'S NOT QUITE RIGHT. THAT IS ONE MAJOR PHOTOSHOT FAIL.

    • http://intensedebate.com/profiles/ermodi ermodi

      Dude you are soooo right.. poor miley because these fucking morons can not look at a body part in the wrong place and understand that it's fake.. Youd THINK a person could have some peace of mind knowing that the people on this planet can tell that it's not real when someone's legs are coming out in all which ways.

      Humans are fucking stupid..

  • e123

    get a life perverts

  • MARVINEUGENE

    She and all celebs knows they are the target of anybody with a camera , they should at least wear some panties if they don't want to show their privates. Real boys are going to LOOK AND DROOL.

  • ty2010

    RE: uncensored….If you censored a picture to post, that means you were in possession of the uncensored picture, as large a crime as distribution.

  • Eyepublius

    She might be only 17 and yes, we all know what child porn is, but this girl and her family treat her and act like she is a -25-year old the way she dresses, uses make up, flaunts around and poses. Her family could be accused of child abuse without the porn angle, IMHO.

    Her appearance certainly is NOT that of innocent 17-year old young lady, not at all. And, I'm no prude (I also had 3 teen daughters).

  • John

    Yep, she has on undies alright….

  • John

    But…. It is possible they slipped to one side when see got out, I have seen that happen before at the beach with girls bathing suits… So just because she is wearing her little danty white pantys does not mean she didn't give a show. And besides she is a grown woman, maybe not 18 yet but you can bet your sweet ass that guy is banging her brains out!!!

  • guest

    Thats right you can see she is plainly exposing herself how wide do you have to open your legs to get out of a car especially with no underware and she knew the picture was being take i've vnever seen a girl with a dress open that wide to get out of car she is an exhibitionist…Go Perez…

    • guest

      shes doing thr brittney spears thing they all do it if it brings in more money and a thril why not…

    • chris

      exactly on point…

  • Eyepublius

    Child porn – maybe? Child abuse by her whacked out parents, yes, I think so. This young girl acts like a 25-year old and tries to come across as a star who draws attention that she and her parents so badly need for more and more money and then they complain. I don't think so.

    Child porn – yes, bad it should be stopped, it, but a 17-year old "star" who is acting like a 25-year old since she was 15 or so, I don't think so … she has put herself in the limelight. There has to be some common sense and decency for everyone … not just those seeking "star photo ops…" And, it starts with the 17-year old and her parents for sure.

  • desadiste

    A seventeen year old is a child? Really? This one does not act like it. This one makes piles of money being allowed to not act like it.
    Who defines what is bad? Why do you believe what they say? Does any of this really matter? Are you being led? Is this all a distraction from the real issues of life, from other much more important things? There are unnecessary wars, destruction of the environment and leaders who cannot lead. Seems like the 'children' are the ones postponing the real issues of adulthood by focusing on silly things. Yes, this IS a silly thing.

  • Guest

    Wow, society sexualizes young girls way too much. And you assholes lap it right the fuck up.

    • You're wrong

      She "sexualised" her self by not wearing painties it's quite obvious the fault is hers not the media's. I'm not saying 45 year old me jerkin' it to this is ok but she chose to dress that way.

      • You're wrong:)

        roflmao You're wrong is right!!!!!

  • msalkdmklsadas

    Perez didn't take the photo, though. If anyone should be getting in trouble it's the paparazzi that took the photo and distributed it.

  • guest

    Miley is the one who should be sued for indecent exposure! :-)

  • bree

    HAHAHHAA SOME OF YOU GUYS ARE FUCKIN RETARTED!!!!!!!!!
    ITS PHOTOSHOPPED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! seriously how dumb can you guys be!

  • chapstick

    it is obvious the picture is fake. look where her waist is compared to the legs. come on I hope we are all not that stupid to believe it. plus you can see her underware in other pics of her.

  • panties

    what the hell is her problem? maybe she should think about the fact that everyone in the general vicinity would have seen her without panties. what idiot gets out of a car like that,, wearing a dress,, without panties….hmmm let me see? an idiot?

  • vee

    I know what Perez did was sooo wrong, beyond wrong but I think (if this photo was real) that Miley should start wearing undies. & if she was, then she should start wearing ones that cover up i mean thats what underwear are for. She is ONLY 17, she should know better. I mean hello, shes wearing a dress.

  • mike

    Where can I find the uncensored photo! I would like to see this before I can judge it appropriate or not.

  • DAVID

    Ladies, if you don't want guys to do the normal thing- GAWK – when ya flash ya stuff like Miley did, then wear drawers or depart one's coach with decorum.

    Me? I'll look in a flash, dudes.

  • chris

    Interesting that all news stories are about Hilton and none with response from Cyrus (either Miley or Daddy). She's been blowing off slutty photos/behaviour so far, but this one goes over the edge. Is it illegal for a 17 year old to expose her bare beaver? Getting out of a car in such a manner looked intentional. Some say this was Photoshopped, but I'd expect Cyrus to say so if true (good point about who took the photo). Maybe Miley has a good reason for wearing no underwear with a skirt and getting out of the car in such a manner.

    Ah, how the little ones grow up so fast these days…

    • booooooooooo!

      you right, but the only thing shes said so far is that perez is an idiot being an idiot, and anyone who read his blog BEFORE this pic could tell you hes about as smart as a grain of sand.

  • G Togs

    I'm a photographer who's photographed a lot of people, clothed, unclothed, aware and posed, unaware and unposed. Cyrus, with all her savvy and experience, knew exactly what she was "posing" in that photo. Oh, my achey-breaky snakey, how much is Billy Ray asking for the car seat?

  • Hugh Jardon

    I think her vagina is perfect and probably tastes like candy. That's why EVERYONE wants to see it. Then in order to reconcile their self-imposed guilt most people behave like the idiots who have posted here to state their pathetic outrage. Child pornography means pornography with children, which is wrong. But Miley Cyrus, much like ALL young women of 17 is not a child, except of course to the phony puritans of the United States and her parents. That vagina is every bit drillable as your mother's. And if one was fortunate enough to drill it, it would no doubt be one of the most memorable experiences of his life.

    Political correctness is organized lying.

    • dat dude

      bravo sir.

  • Sgt. Rock

    I think it's a publicity stunt to promote her next album. And by the way, people used to get married when they were only 14 or 15 a hundred years ago. Miley is a fully grown women, not a child. And she's not naive, people in showbiz know a lot. I think we have to have a special category for these Hollywood "actresses" who are exhibitionists (all females are exhibitionists but Hollywood women use it for promotional purposes), after all, we have to put these things in perspective. America is too uptight and Puritanical. I just hope Miley doesn't self-destruct like Lindsay Lohan with booze and drugs and promiscuity.

    • superior

      oh just watch she will! and this isnt a way to get ppl to buy her album. its a way to get people to snap her CDs in half

  • Exactly.

    Jeez, She planned for this.{If this is even real, Looks like a photoshop fail} Shes getting out of control now, Very out of control. This isn't a way to make people stop calling you a kid, Idiot. Why would you do that to yourself? Why would you go home without panties!? I think its gross.. Ew. Its really stupid of her, Good job Perez, Make her feel stupid. r.r Or make yourself feel dumb for a photoshop fail! DX

  • guest

    Where can i see the picture uncensored ?

  • goperez!

    she is such a s.lut! have you guys seen her lesbo kiss performance?!? if this pic being exposed to public is considered to do with child porn then how do you explain her lesbo kiss performance on british tv? if someone should be sued or be sent to jail then thats mileys parents!!! this girl aint a child!!! she acts like a grown up! i remember seeing her lil sis on an award show's red carpet ceremony. ewwww how she was posing to cameras with her lil fella! come on!!! you should blame the parents!!! this girl is unleashed and needs to be tamed!!!

  • Luc

    People should be more upset at the fact that this 'baby' or 'child' as people keep referring to her… was out and about on her own power WITHOUT underware for whatever ungodly reason and conciously spreading her legs. I'm sorry but if you're going to behave like a slut and be a celebrity, don't bash on people who call you on it.

  • MILEYS NUMBER 1 FAN

    WTF i recon hes a pedo. GET A LIFE U LIL BA******……..!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • http://www.yahoo.com/ alexa

    what in the worl was he thinking! u can’t just go around posting people without underwears on, especially if they are under the age of 18. he should definetly get punnished for this. he had no excuse!

  • tim

    Fucking hens in the hen house.

    She had underwear you morons.

  • M-Dot

    Yep, lets face it. Girly here dress likes shes twemty one, if she is so young and innocent why is she out in public with no knickers on? Besides, getting out of that car like that, in that dress wit no panties? Girl was just asking to make the front page. Lets face it, we'd all rather see young fresh hanging out on a sunny day, if the queen had her minge out on a sunny day we'd al be like, please mam wrap that cat up!!!

  • http://intensedebate.com/profiles/corvedacosta Corve DaCosta

    damn

  • cede

    Wait! Look there is someone underneath her! It is clearly photoshopped

    • mike

      do you have the upskirt pic?

  • Tori

    Miley, honey…LEARN TO CLOSE YOUR LEGS AND WEAR SOME UNDERWEAR!!!!!!!!! why are people making a big deal about this? it isn't Perez's fault Miley doesn't know where the underwear section in Walmart is, or that the doesn't know how to act in a dress. if Perez has to go to jail because of this photo, then so should Miley's parents for letting her wear LINGERIE at her concerts. the way she dresses at her concerts might as well be porn. so get off Perez's back.

  • Tori

    exactly. it looks like she is climbing OVER the door. WHY DID GOD GIVE US DOORS ON CARS? So we don't have to flash the public when not wearing underwear while getting out..

    • Amanda

      well if it's for a video shoot, maybe thats how the director wanted her to be.. regardless i doubt she would be stupid enough to go without underwear with a bunch of music directors and crew there.. plus i'm sure her parents would majorly freak…

  • JudgeX

    For all of you who continue to call this "child pornography": .

    You need to look up "lewd and lascivious" for definitions.

    What you will find out is that it's not pornography if it's a candid shot of someone getting out of a car. You cannot prove that the picture was taken with the intent of causing arousal, it's simply a picture that happens to expose more than was intended by the subject, and you cannot prove the photographer meant for this to be arousing. He could even think it's funny, and believe that Miley Cyrus is a bad person who deserves to be ridiculed and exposed in degrading ways… and since she's a celebrity and reaps the benefits of the public eye, she can't really do much about it.

    This is a giant bag of nothing. I don't like Perez Hilton, and I don't give half a shit about celebrities of any sort, but after hitting this story about 12 times on other sites, I thought it was time to come and end the fantasy.

    It is not lewd or lascivious behavior. Is she fingering herself, or stripped naked about to participate in a porn scene? No. Is she exposing herself in public purposefully or being forced to? No. Thus, not lascivious.

    Now, does Miley Cyrus have grounds for a civil case against Perez Hilton? Maybe, I really don't know, but the Child Pornography angle is over.

    • Matt

      Hahaha, this is totally false what you just said. He POSTED child pornography. The photographer isn't in question, it is the POSTING of the photograph AFTER he realized it was of her lower region exposed. THEREFORE your argument is completely false in its merit. Your whole posting is about the actual photographer who is not in question. Posting of child pornography that you KNEW was child pornography is illegal.

      • SchoolYou

        No, you're completely wrong, sorry. Simple nudity which does not feature the genitals in a lewd or lascivious way is not illegal. See photos of family nudism or even teen nudist beauty contests. They have nude teens MUCH more exposed than Ms. Cyrus is and they are patently NOT illegal. JUST having someone under age 18 nude, is NOT grounds for it being child porn. Don't believe me? Just google "nude teen beauty pageant" and then shut up. Learn the laws.

        • AnonLovesNobodyFully

          Haha.. fucking pwned a bitch!

  • lulu

    IT WAS DONE WITH PHOTO SHOP______YOU IDIOTS

    • Lawyer

      That's even worse for him. Simulated child porn is just as illegal as the real thing if it is based on the manipulation of an image of a real child (something that was entirely CGI would probably be okay). If he's the one who created the image it means that government can prove intent.

  • worldrimroamer

    You sexually-hung-up Puritan hypocrites. First, a 17-year-old is not a "child", she is a young woman. Second, she chose not to wear panties. OK, that's fine. No problem. No big deal. The guy just snapped a photo of an adult woman getting out of a car. Duuhh!

    This idiocy is an insult to TRUE child pornography, and to the children who are victimized by it. This IS NOT child pornography. It's just more trivial Hollywood. Just get over it and shut the you-know-what up.

    • JacetJay

      Thank you! And there's people commenting, "Apparently, this picture isn't even real." Who cares enough to even look into this? YOU my friend must have a weird obsession with her vag.
      And we're all worrying about THIS when REAL child pornography is what we should be worrying about.

  • cowgrlK

    For a faggot, he sure does have a lot of interest in vagina's. I'd like to see him crawl back under the rock he came from.

  • Evelyn

    I can't stand the ass h…. I hope he gets arrested for this.

  • John

    Quite frankly, I think the whole thing is funny. And while Perez Hilton is a major league tool, a 17.5 year old girl's whiskerbiscuit does not count as kiddie porn.

  • HarmonikaSavingbond

    Perez better hope her big hot daddy don't come gunning for his ass.

  • God was a Volvo

    It's not child pornography as defined (delimited) by law. This is no more than nudity, if she actually was nude. The idea that "panty shots" are illegal derives from an untested legal theory that claims sexually suggestive images of nude or clothed minors constitute sexual abuse absent actual sexual abuse. The lawyer's comments are assinine. The requirements for actual cause involve not only a display of genitals but also the act of actual or simulated ie apparent sex. Implied ie suggestive sexuallity is protected expression. If this is illegal than so is her pole dance, lap dance and every other dance Miley ever did.

    • mandy

      It has been stated the photo was photoshopped. So glad you know it all about untested legal theories. Are you Perez's lawyer?

  • Candice

    Okay seriously? One, I find this not to be a huge deal; she's the one spreading her legs. Two, the picture is EXTREMELY photoshopped, and not even done well.

  • Undertaker

    It's obviously photoshopped. It was done so poorly, it's like an elephant trying to hide under a rock.

    Plus, it's for a photo shoot (or a video shoot, I'm not entirely sure) so it's fine for her to go out like that. It's not like she's wearing that just to go buy food or whatever. The car is a prop.

    Get your facts straight people.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/AnAmericanLion AnAmericanLion

    I would have to say that, yes, Mr. Hilton (Levandaria? Is that his real name?) should be immediately arrested and charged with a crime. What will then happen is this–the flunkies who actually write his blog will continue and a gullible public will be none the wiser.

  • G M L

    PHOTO SHOP BUT SUE THAT S O B

  • G M L

    MOST OF HER FANS ARE TEENS & PRE TEENS ! IT’S A FAKE. SHAME ON THAT SICK PERSON FOR POSTING ANYTHINNG LIKE THAT

  • guest

    thanks!

  • Martin

    thats a shopped photo folks, even at first glance it don't look right how long is her waist anyway?

  • kei

    oh what the hell??>>>>>>>>>

  • haha

    he,s a sick dimented homo

  • uncle chester

    It's funny how few of you know the laws. It didn't used to be illegal to make fake kp pics. however, those days went away during bush. no pun intended. Doesn't matter why he did it. He knew she was underage and he posted it on the net. The law says he has to be charged.

  • dani

    this is nothing compared to the shit she's been pulling on stage (thrusting her crotch, grabbing her crotch, pretending to make out with a female dancer). she's a skank. she probably sent the picture to perez herself.

  • Robert Arvanitis

    Wait, wait.
    The girl that Roman Polanski raped was only 13 at the time, and Whoopi Goldberg told us that it was not really "rape-rape."
    So how can a mere set of pixels, of a 17 year old, who dresses herself (!), be child porn?
    I mean, if Miley had met Roman when she was just 14 say, she was free to travel across state lines and have that abortion without telling old Bill Ray…

  • violet st clair

    pretty sure she was wearing flesh coloured underwear, so who cares really…. there should be an etiquette in place for exiting a car! this is all a bit silly. she sexualises herself anyway … there's no law against minors thrusting against their backup dancers.

  • Marc

    The angles of her legs are just wrong for the position she's in…. kind of like the criminal who wears a goofy hat to draw attention away from his face. Everyone is so focused on the "prize," it's easy to miss the impossibility of the way her alleged legs are attached to her body. People calling this a fake are right, looks like to me.

    If for some reason the morons in govt. bring this to court, hopefully there will be some kind of "Photoshop expert" around who will testify that it's bogus.

    In addition to all that, I don't see what the fuss is about. There are zillions of infinitely hotter young girls and women around. So much of this "celebrity" nonsense is a pathetic combination of connections and mass psychology.

  • http://www.light-to-dark.com/Stephen_Pitt_Cartoons.html lthuedk

    Bush and Cheney green-lighted acts of torture, murder, conspiracy, and theft. While Hilton deserves prosecution, what will happen to those committed to killing justice from the top? Nothing. American Justice is dead-not blind-dead. It's just not yet realized by the uninformed, Fox-misled, knuckle-draggers..

  • GROSS

    maybe she should wear underwear.

  • Guest

    #1 girls dont go out without some skivvies on to cover up the goods #2 what he did was wrong but #3 her new image is very slutty and she's okay with it…so …… I see another Brit Spears on the horizon….seriously…. she brings the $hit upon herself!

    • right

      actualy i think your wrong, brit cleaned up her act pretty nicely, but i see miley taking lindseys place as queen of sluts and whores evertwhere

  • Luis Claudio

    Predictions for Miley Cirus life= Perdition + when she is 18 you will see all the scandals this girl is going to bring out. She wnts to be out of her parents hands x by she is going to be as similar as Lindey Lohan living a Crazy life. She is the next victim of a very unpleasant sexual life. Miley is been sucked up by this Hollywood Demons that all they do is pervert little girls. Now she is hooked and cant come out of it. She haves to much money, AND WHEN SHE IS 18 SHE WONT BE ABLE TO CONTROL IT. GOD HAVE MERCY ON THIS GIRL. IM POSTING IT HERE TODAY 06/16/2010 HER LIFE IS GOING TO BE AS MISERABLE AS ALL THE HOLLYWOOD ACTOR AND SINGERS. THEY HAVE MONEY BUT THEY SO EMPTY IN THEIR LIFE THAT, GOD IS THE ONLY ONE THAT CAN CHANGE THEIR LIFE. THATS WHAT MILEY CIRUS NEEDS , SHE NEEDS GOD IN HER LIFE OTHERWISE I SEE SELF DESTRYCT AFTER SHE TURNS 18. THIS IS GOING TO BE BRITTNEY SPEARS CONTINUATION. SORRY PEOPLE I HAD TO POST THIS BCUZ THIS IS WHAT I SEE ON THAT GIRLS LIFE. HOPE GOD COULD INTERFERE AND SAVE HER.

    • angry

      your sooooooooooooo right! mostly. i still want to become a famous singer but i won't let the little hollywood sl*** get to me and make me want to f*** everyone i meet! im not completly blaming miley, cause she used to be a good girl, but this is mostly her fault. and whatever blame im not putting on miley, im puttin on the parents, for allowing her, NO, INCOURAGING her to make herself an icon for wh**** everywhere! and the fact to read comments on youtube and see people supporting and incouraging her to do this! i dont know what happened to miley, but i hope that god can reverse it!

  • kathy

    if she's such a fool as to let it all hang out, she can blame nobody for looking or posting a photo. i doubt daddy cares.

  • kathy

    fake hair. fake girl.

    • mandy

      dont forget FAke TEETH! She had her teeth veneered. Yep. Fake girl.

  • isaac

    Perez Hilton is a sick queer. Why does everyone messes with Miley? Why does everybody hates her? Hilton should get it big time.

  • Porky D.

    This is ridiculous, Cyrus is not a child so it can't be child porn and that's all there is to it. Argument over.

    • mileyloverrrr

      SHES UNDER 18 DUMB ASS SHE'S NOT LEGALLY AN ADULT

  • mandy

    So I can't say I'm surprised to hear about Miley in the news again regarding her hoo haa. Obviously she can't get enough of the attention whenever she needs attention for her music videos. Shock value is lost when her music isn't that great after all the attention she finally gets. Fugly.

  • ASHLEY

    I think some of you individuals are saying rude and unessecary things because A. You're blind, B. You feel she's an appropriate target, or C. You're just plain iggnornat and stupid. That photo obviously looks photoshopped. Furthermore, Hilton himself assured everyone it was fake. He says she was wearing underware, but I don't think it's real at all. I mean, the way she's positioned to get out of the car, is not only unlady like in various ways, but also looks unnatural and out of position.
    Does Miley act slightly older then her age, and seems to crave the attention of adults? In some ways, yes.
    Should Hilton go to jail? No.
    Should he be reprimanded hard for being an idiot and taking such a picture in the first place? Yes.
    Was this a BIG deal? No, not nessecarily. But this soon will be forgotten.
    *Please note if you don't like what I wrote, you don't need to reply. I'm not stating my opnion, seeing as I am allowed to do so.
    Questions? ; Comments? ashleybeowolf@yahoo.com

  • ASHLEY

    ** I apologize for my misspelled words, ^^ and yes, I am stating my opinion. I don't know why I wrote I wasn't. -____-

  • Jamie

    It is wrong of Perez to immaturaly put the photo online.. But c'mon… What is she doing in the first place with opening her legs wide open?? And why is she not wearing underwear?? Doesn't make sense. Whoever was around her could have seen it, and put it online.. She should've been more careful and more lady like..

  • john doe

    everyone knows that she's a skanky hillbilly whore.

  • billy

    sick fuker needs to have the hell beat out of him and thrown in jail for child porn. but do you honestly think that he will get into any trouble. hell no because thats the way that the law works. if you have money you can get yourself out of anything. and if you are just a regular tom dick or harry and have pictures of a 17 year old and place it on the net man the feds would be all over you and then once you got put into jail you would really see what its like to have your head busted open

  • http://wizardhat.deviantart.com Roger

    Combining this image and the words child porography is the real crime here.
    It makes it sound not "that" bad.
    The victims of child pornography are usually not even teenagers, and many are still years away from their first double-digit birthday.
    We really don't need this to lessen the seriousness of this abuse.

  • Chris

    My god.. only in america!.. nudity is porn? What have the world become

  • pattyr

    Why the hell is this redneck twit even going out of the house SANS underwear? This would never even be an issue has she done so!! Where are her parents and why do they keep letting her get away with this crap? She posed for these over age photos on purpose with her dad there…Get a grip people…

  • LiL Vee

    ooh miley what a dirtbag you are if you dont want your ladie buisness posted on the internet maybe you should put on some panties, like the rest of the other hot messes in Hollywood im sure rehab is next. I dont know what is worse the sight of your mouth or crotchhhh…soooo muchhh for good southern up bringing!!!

  • Angela

    Perez is a guy who'd do stupid things for publicity, like he'd trash Kim Kardashian on his website, but during the launch of his first book, he posted a photo of him with her and called her sweet little names.. talk about hypocrisy..

  • terry

    He is sick, But the girl needs to put her granny panties on.

  • MaKayla

    Umm Hello People!! I could Bet you 100 dollars Miley Cyrus is not a virgen!!! I mean i havent seen the original uncensored photo but duh im a girl and im not GAY so y would i want 2? Look i dont really like Miley but i think some of her music is good so as long as her career isnt effected then Y DOES EVERYONE CARE ABOUT THIS BULLSHIT SO MUCH???? Ya'll arnt her so y should anyone even care?? I dont care so y should anyone else??

  • ddhur

    i dont know about the actual crotch (cause i havent seen the original nor do i want to), but her body wasnt photoshopped. if you took anatomy class you would know. location of the waist and pelvis looks weird cause of the dress, her hip is right where the legs are connected.

  • Cris

    oh, brother.
    I suppose she can go out like that and flash her twat, but if someone takes a picture of her (and who would? there's no way anyone would be taking miley cyrus's picture) and then shows it to other strangers to see, then he's abusing her in some way. What about the people who looked at her? Are they voyeurs? I suppose we're all a big gang of child abusers and sex perverts because she got into this position knowing she had no pants on?

    hypocrits

  • SUEANDREA

    Although I dislike Perez Hilton's brand of entertainment, WHAT I DISLIKE EVEN MORE IS THE YOUNG MUSIC ENTERTAINERS PRODUCING WHAT HAS BECOME MUSIC PORN. IT SEEMS TO BE THE CURRENT MODE OF ENTERTAINMENT, THE MORE SHOCKING THE BETTER., I AM VERY SAD THAT TALENT HAS DEGENERATED INTO PORN INSTEAD OF SHOWCASING REAL TALENT. A GOOD EXAMPLE IS WHEN ADAM LAMBERT SANG MAD WORLD, THAT WAS REAL TALENT, BUT HE SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND IT NECESSARY TO COMPETE IN PORN MUSIC. AS FOR MILEY SHE IS ON HE SAME PATH, TOO SAD.

  • candi

    either its a fake pic or not, from what some are saying, she should probly be more careful how she gets in and out of cars. and when you know there are ppl taking pics of you…MORE CAREFUL!

  • Amanda

    Perez is a gay ass mother fucker. He needs to get himself a life instead of trying to hog the light. I'm a girl and I don't really act "lady like" because i have an older brother that I fight with all the time, he taught me. Miley has 2 older brothers and who's to say that she doesn't do the same thing? I believe this picture was photoshopped and everyone should know that Perez likes doing stuff to the pictures he gets. He needs to go to jail for what he done. Maybe that should teach him not to do something like this again to another celeb so he can just get fame.

  • annoyed

    OMG, what is the big deal about whether its been photoshopped or not? yes, i agree it was wrong to post that photo, yes, i think that he should have waited until miley was old enough to take that picture herself, and turn into lindset lohan, or britney spears if she hasnt already, but is it really child porn to photograph a 17 year old chick who's been acting like shes old enough to dring beer? if she really didn't have any underwear on then im not sure why everyones surprised. it was only a matter of time. if she DID have some on than im sure its only a matter of time before someone gets a REAL shot! if her parents let her act this way than Perez isnt the only one who should go to jail.

  • Teresa

    I honestly can't stand Miley Cyrus, but this is low and sooo wrong. She is just a child… Perez Hilton is a complete ass! I feel bad for her. It's not like shes the only one…

  • R Kelly piss on you

    You people who are calling this stupid photo of her Child porn, clearly dont know what child porn is, this ho is almost 18, not 12,13,14,15. she is just getting out of her car, Where is the outrage from her parents? there daughter is running around with no underwear. she cant afford any?
    Would you want to waste millions of tax dollars on a BS Case that this guy will just put up some money and walk free anyways. R Kelly video is what child porn looks like, and he walked free. Unless Perez put out a video pooping or peeing on Miley I wouldnt consider it Child porn.

  • oh yeah

    It's not even a good fake

  • whatpoposaidatschool

    It is considered child pornography since a seventeen girl can "sext" her boyfriend can be charged with producing child pornography and distrubiting child pornography. It is most definately child pornography since Miley would be charged if she did consent, which she did not.

    • Alex Gould

      Its fucking retards like you that piss the hell outta me. To begin, even a ten year old girl could send nude pictures to her boyfriend without it being "child pornography". It only becomes illigal if the forementioned boyfriend shows another person the picture, without first getting permission from the girl. Similar with sexual intercourse. Two minors can have sex all they want. As long as they are both minors, it is 100% LEGAL!!!
      Miley cyrus made the mistake of leaving her house without underwear on. She is 17. When a seventeen year old goes out in public without panties, she obviously doesnt mind a little 'attention'. She wanted people to notice, and therefore, by willingly choosing not to wear underwear, knowing this would expose her private area, it cannot be considered child pornography. This is no more a case of child pornography than it is a case of general stupidity.

      My name is Alex Gould, and feel free to contact me, anyone, whenever you would like. Me email address is alexgould77@gmail.com

  • Foxy Dee-Rae

    This fn idiot!!! WTH was he thinking?! Ok even if you don't like Miley there just comes a point where you got to realize this is just morally wrong!!! Plus she's only 17 WTH HILTON!!!!!!!!!! Not cool @ all…you deserve some jail time jerk!!! >;-(

  • Miley Rox !

    Miley ignore all this crap , keep being happy and forget these sad jealous and often sick comments posted here.

  • lol

    Good old uptight repressed america, the land of the free, and largest producer of porn worldwide. This may come as a shock but nature decides how and when a child develops their sexuality and maturity, not one country's laws. If this was a 12 year old and not a 17 year old sexpot, you'd have a right to be shocked, so just get real and don't give yourselves unnecessary heart attacks, you busybody freaks.

  • Mona

    Who actually has the picture of Miley? I have seen an image and it is blocked out.

  • polloloco

    There’s no pic all these is pure created BS.. much like 9/11… hype for the media, webhits for PREZ and its crew, money from sponsors yay let ’em have another feast on scraps, OR do you think he is really that stupid to post a picture of an underage? The reason why he’s rich and you are not lies underneath it all.. now eat a bowl of shit flavoured ice cream.

  • Johnny Noir

    If she were hot it might be porn, but since she is a disgusting pig, it's just disgusting. It's like watching someone vomit.

  • john29

    Id fuck her even if she had the panties on. just rip em off.. i mean look at her.. shes practically screaming for cock..

  • Chosen One

    He isn't an idiot. He's Perez Hilton; what do you expect? Bloggers, Journalists and Papparazi will stop at nothing to get the latest scoop so they can have their blood money. Unfortunately it's a dog-eat-dog world, and people will exploit others for their own gain. Fortunately, I can't stand Miley Cyrus – nothing good is going to come of her now that she has retracted from Disney and opting for the more sexy-side of life. Incase YOU didn't realise, she is a 17 year old girl not wearing underwear – she barely wears anything in her music videos nowadays anyway. And for the record, it's not child pornography. She's not a child, she's in her late teens. She even refers to herself as a "mature woman" now, so let's see what she's made of. Stupid bitch.

  • mike

    dont you she did that on purpose to attract attention. She's 17 but she knew what she was doing.

  • AN Other

    The fact is that she must think she’s a bit of a vamp….but in reality she’s a seventeen year old tramp. It’s her choice of course, but why isn’t she wearing any underwear?

    If that was a picture of a guy getting out of the car with the head of his penis exposed, would anyone be bothered with Perez?

    Short answer no, the flood of criticism would be unleashed on the guy getting out of the car.

    Double standards are everywhere.

  • Justice

    Whether the picture is real or not, It’s both of their faults, she is 17 and so she should act like a 17 year old and wear an underwear, and he shouldn’t have posted the link of the picture on the internet like a perv, she is underage so it’s just wrong, also miley cyrus has done many things like this in the past too and this is just one of them and many will agree that more of it is about to come in the near future, let’s face it after she turns 18 she’s free to do whatever the hell she wants, it’s just who she is, now some will say she’s free minded, some will say other things, truth is, she gonna do what she wants to do, no matter what people say, its her parents that should keep her in boundaries, not us. and also this actually this does not count as child pornography.

  • bob

    if a see a picture, i can say ig its bad or not hehe lol

  • Abbie

    THERE IS SOMEONE IN FRONT OF HER!!! THERE IS SOMEONE BEHIND HER! WHY IS SHE NOT WEARING PANTIES AROUND WHAT LOOKS LIKE TWO DUDES???? Any chick who has respect for herself is going to know that wearing a dress, with no underwear and OPENING YOUR LEGS LIKE A BUTTERFLY FOR THE WHOLE WORLD TOO SEE, is not common sense!!! Shes is just upset because her skinny ass got caught up…. THAT is his job, take horrible pictures of celebrirties and post them for the world to see. Its her job to keep her legs closed when she knows the world IS watching!!! He is fucking GAY, and she just made a video were ALOT of her body is already showing off. If she was wearing panties then, and spreading her legs for a music video, then what is the difference of Him taking a picture and posting it on the internet? ( SWEETHEART YOU ALREADY MADE YOURSELF LOOK LIKE A TEEN PORN STARR BY THE LAST VIDEO YOU MADE!!) I dont think sexually he had any intent to cause this girl harm! HE SHOULD NOT BE CHARGED FOR CHILD PHORNOGRAPHY.. I mean come the fuck on she is 17 almost 18, Im sure the girl has seen more dick then you or I put together!!! haha!

  • Steve

    I have seen the pic OMG she is so hot. GOOD for you Perez In my state 16 is the legal age of consent and if i had the chance I would love to have her.

  • Jerry

    She didn't wear underweaar b/c she's being coached to be the next Brittney whore- It's a publicity stunt that shows another generation of yung girls that being a whore is cool and is now the ideal asperation- the media has no ethics and keep dumbing down the nation. I hope for the end of Holly-wierd and it starts with us and what message we send to those in our circle of influence

  • Just me

    “Reasonable expectation of privacy”, google it.

  • SargeDS91

    She had a picture of her crotch taken. So did Paris, Lindsey and Brittany. Nobody bitched about that!! Was anyone concerend when she was 15 yrs old dating 20 and 22 yr old guys. Where were the "Statutory Rape" people then? Apparently their is no parental guidance what so ever. Leagally she is still concidered a minor in most states. Where is her guardian or who ever watches over little rich kids? If they don't give a shit about her going out pantiless, why should we? If you are offended!!! Don't look!!!

  • Anomoly

    I know that she is just under a year from being an adult and this is considered Child Pornogrpahy but seriously look. If she was 18 this probably wouldn't explode as much as it did. It's not like she's some 5 year old girl being molested by some sick person.

  • ljlj

    mileys a hoe anyway

  • xjohnmac

    Thank you so much Hilton Perez !!! Please keep up the good work… More photos please !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! She is bery hot and delicious

  • xjohnmac

    Come on perez can we at least get a sex video of her???????????? PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I am waiting

  • xjohnmac

    Jeezzz guys I wish my face was a camera lens dont you??? diving in tounge first !!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • `

    lol so many retarded posts here, this isn’t CP you stupidshits

  • Kaylan Hunt

    if she decides not to wear any underwear ok thats fine its a free country just try not to look but thats goin to be tempting

  • alena

    she is so stuped… and ugly

  • michel

    she thinking she is so old shi is just 17 e old and she didint wear underwear oh that is so stuped man…!!!

  • SARA PALIN

    WHAT EVER MAKES THE HEADLINES…MORE MONEY FOR THOSE SPOILED ROTTEN GURLS OF RICH PEOPLE… ITS ONLY VAGINA.. AN MILEY OR HILTON ARE NOT INNOCENT.. THERE DADS ARE TRYING TO BE..WHEN MILEY GETS ON PLAYBOY WHEN SHE TURNS 18 IM GONA BUY A COPY TO HAVE IN MY BATHROOM… AN YOU CANT DO A THING ABOUT IT DAD….18 IN THIS COUNTRY IS AN ADULT… ITS EVEN YOUNGER IN EUROPE…. SO PEOPLE CALM DOWN AN GET YOUR OWN LIFE STOP GETTING INTO OTHER PEOPLE PRIVATE MATTERS…. THIS IS AMERICA? AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE ALLWAYS TRING TO FIX THINGS THATS NOT BROKEN AN THEN CHARGE THE TAX PAYER….

  • RX for Pain

    You people calling this *Child Porn* are MORONS. Why don't you go read a recent interview with little miss Miley and see HOW OLD HER BOYFRIEND IS!!! Is he a Child Molestor? He's in his 20's…she's still UNDERAGE!! And if you think they Aren't Having Sex you're being naive. She did this on PURPOSE to get PUBLICITY. I'm actually NOT a Fan of Perez Hilton, not at All. I'm also not a fan of STUPIDITY. So, if this is child porn then Miley's boyfriend needs to be thrown in Prison for being a Child Molestor. This isn't the Disney Channel boys and girls, this is the grown up world. Either live in it and deal with it, or go the hell back to living in your little Disney World.

  • ryan

    3 things here.
    1. Photo is faked.
    2. After the age of 16 a child can legally consent to sexual relations ect ect. (canada)
    3. Perez may have photo shopped the image himself which in that case if he used a photo with a female over the age of consent the photo would NOT be considered child porn. It could still be considered slander however and the proof that the image is from an older women would have to be shown. (note these are all canadian references)

  • BigDog

    Why does every young bollywood 'celeb' strive to be such a skank? IE: LiLo, Paris, Britney, et al. answer: $money$

  • hello people

    i think its funny when somebody who isnt famous and puts nude pics on the web its ok but then when sombody who is famous does it every body flippes out

  • Brenden

    Maybe she should not be a little whore and wear underwear…
    Not saying what he's doing is right… but it's funny how slutty a lot of girls dress and they act upset and embarrassed when this kind of thing happens.

  • Concerned Mother

    Miley has been trying desperatetly to drop the Disney label by mock frenching a girl in concert among a few other things. If you are 17 and go out in public without underwear you may be secretly hoping that some photographer would catch the million dollar snapshot to catapolt her to sex symbol status.
    The consequences of her actions is that the photogrpaher and the PerezHilton played along with her silly game, albeit unknowingly. If someone suggested she try this stunt and they were over 18 then they were contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Legally they are responible for their actions and must answer to the laws designed to protect minors.

  • Concerned Mother

    Morally, Miley is responsible. She is old enough to know that leaving the house without underwear, then making a very obvious move to expose yourself is very stupid. I bet she is going to release a statement saying that underwear makes her uncomfortable. No one will believe her.
    The law states that anyone under the age of 18 is not mature enought to understand the consequences of their actions. However, a working 17 year old who deals frequently with media contracts would surely have first hand knowledge of what photographs could and could not be taken of her. This stunt was obviously the brain child of a (I hope not) soon to become Lindsay Lohan wannabe, but that does not excuse the photographer or any adult for their actions.
    I hope someone presses charges for indescent exposure of they could make it stick. Teach 'em young to repsect the law and to be morally responsible public figures.

  • Kristin

    So…technically…wouldn't Miley be able to be punished by law for spreading child pornography by posting all those raunchy photos of her malnourished body all over the internet???

  • bleh!

    Wrong wrong wrong. Police take a look above!

  • Ryan

    You don't know what you are talking about. Child pornography is any picture of a minor engaged in "sexually explicit conduct" which is defined to include "graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person." 18 U.S.C. §§ 2256(2)(b), (8).

  • the grammar police

    FYI – the phrase is "for all intents and purposes" not "for all intensive purposes".

  • MLD

    Um… no. You would be very unlikely to see the clitoris in that photo. You would see labia, and maybe the mons veneris, but you'd need a pretty hi-res image to see the clitoris. You ARE at least correct in that her vagina wouldn't be seen.

  • Linda

    Thank you! Finally someone said it. Doesn't matter whether it was photoshopped or not. Key words: "graphic or simulated." If he posted it, he broke the law. It's simple. Whereas he broke the law, she was just stupid if she didn't wear underwear. Stupid is not illegal.

  • MLD

    I think the keyword is lascivious. This isnt.

  • Ryan

    The legal standard for "lascivious" isn't cut and dry. The federal courts use a bunch of different tests, the results of which are not easy to predict. Under some of the stricter standards–e.g. a depiction of a child's genitals is presumed to be lascivious unless there is evidence that the depiction serves a legitimate purpose (such as appearing in a medical textbook, in a bona fide work of art, or in normal family photographs)–it is lascivious.

    Bottom line is that even if there isn't enough to convict him, there is probably enough to indict him.